Cross-border securities mandate
Safekeeping, settlement routing, reconciliation and asset servicing configured for the markets and instruments agreed during onboarding.
Institutional solutions
Institutional custody is not selected from a catalogue. It is designed around ownership, jurisdiction, asset eligibility, settlement, information rights and the authority to instruct.
Solution families
Choose a family to review the operating questions and capabilities normally considered when defining an institutional relationship.
Markets, assets and operating cash
A cross-border appointment connects eligible markets and assets to account structures, settlement routes, currencies, counterparties and reporting rights.
Safekeeping, settlement routing, reconciliation and asset servicing configured for the markets and instruments agreed during onboarding.
Controlled records, document evidence and capital-event administration for eligible non-listed holdings within the contracted scope.
Operational cash accounts, currency flows and approval controls aligned with settlement obligations and authorised movements.
Vehicles, beneficiaries and governance
The control architecture differs for a segregated portfolio, a collective vehicle and a long-horizon asset owner. The appointment must reflect who owns, governs and instructs.
Accounts, authorities, eligible assets and reporting arranged around a single institutional owner and its documented investment mandate.
Custody and administration interfaces defined around the vehicle, valuation cycle, investor activity and applicable oversight model.
Long-horizon custody, cash and evidence designed for boards, trustees, committees and their appointed advisers.
Evidence, analysis and delivery
The same mandate that controls assets and cash should define what information is produced, who may receive it and how exceptions are evidenced.
Position, cash, transaction and settlement reporting linked to reconciled records, defined calendars and retained control evidence.
Agreed performance, attribution and risk datasets prepared from available source records and configured reference data.
Portal, scheduled files and controlled reporting outputs aligned with user permissions, responsibilities and the contracted service scope.
Oversight, escrow and independent challenge
Fiduciary appointments are defined by legal capacity, independence, governing documents, escalation duties and the evidence required to support decisions.
Monitoring and escalation frameworks shaped by the vehicle, applicable duties and the operational information available to the appointee.
Transaction-specific holding and release conditions documented for authorised parties, evidence, approvals and defined completion events.
Independent review, documented challenge and governance reporting within the duties and authority established by the appointment.
Mandate design process
Every appointment is subject to legal, operational, jurisdictional, asset and counterparty review. Availability depends on the final agreed scope.
Legal entity, governing documents, decision makers, beneficiaries and authorised representatives.
Assets, markets, currencies, accounts, counterparties, settlement routes and information flows.
Instructions, approvals, cut-offs, reconciliations, exceptions, escalation and evidence retention.
Only after documentation, due diligence, configuration, testing and acceptance are complete.
Institutional enquiry
We begin with the legal owner, the assets, the markets and the authority to act. From there, the operating model can be defined with precision.
Start a mandate discussion